Daily-memory protocol module is unavailable from allowed Decidr paths, so code edits cannot start safely under worker rules.

Worker process exited while command was still in_progress: /bin/bash -lc "node <<'NODE' const { chromium } = require('@playwright/test'); const fs = require('fs/promises'); const path = require('path'); const outDir = path.resolve('evidence/dec-81'); const baseUrl = 'http://127. Recent context: icit REST transport variables and no secret printing; if Clerk or transport config still blocks the UI, that becomes a clean DEC-81 blocker. · The local Next server is up on `127.0.0.1:3000` with REST transport pointed at the public Hetzner API. I’m running a focused Playwright capture that saves a swipe screenshot, HAR, redacted curl equivalent, and the dispatch response under `evidence/dec-81/`.

BLOCKER_FORCED_BLANK: worker emitted blocker with no usable summary; reason=reprompt-still-bare

BLOCKER_FORCED_BLANK: worker emitted blocker with no usable summary; reason=reprompt-still-bare

BLOCKER_FORCED_BLANK: worker emitted unknown with no usable summary; reason=reprompt-still-bare

BLOCKER_FORCED_BLANK: worker emitted blocker with no usable summary; reason=reprompt-still-bare

BLOCKER_FORCED_BLANK: worker emitted blocker with no usable summary; reason=reprompt-still-bare

BLOCKER_FORCED_BLANK: worker emitted unknown with no usable summary; reason=reprompt-still-bare

BLOCKER_FORCED_BLANK: worker emitted blocker with no usable summary; reason=reprompt-still-bare

BLOCKER_FORCED_BLANK: worker emitted unknown with no usable summary; reason=reprompt-still-bare

BLOCKER_FORCED_BLANK: worker emitted blocker with no usable summary; reason=reprompt-still-bare

BLOCKER_FORCED_BLANK: worker emitted unknown with no usable summary; reason=reprompt-still-bare

Worker process exited while command was still in_progress: /bin/bash -lc 'npm run build'. Recent context: orage clearing. · The edit is scoped to the requested page. I’m running the standard code gates now; for browser verification I’ll first see whether the app can render the dashboard route locally without buyer credentials. · `npm run lint` and `npx tsc --noEmit` passed. I’m running the production build next because this route is under the App Router and build catches client/server boundary issues.

BLOCKER_FORCED_BLANK: worker emitted unknown with no usable summary; reason=reprompt-still-bare

BLOCKER_FORCED_BLANK: worker emitted unknown with no usable summary; reason=reprompt-still-bare

BLOCKER_FORCED_BLANK: worker emitted unknown with no usable summary; reason=reprompt-still-bare

Worker process exited while command was still in_progress: /bin/bash -lc 'NEXT_IGNORE_INCORRECT_LOCKFILE=1 npm run build'. Recent context: m clearing only the build artifact directory and rerunning the build with the Next lockfile-patch bypass to isolate real compile errors. · The failed build reached static generation and the missing trace file now exists on disk, so the error appears to be Next’s standalone trace collection flaking after the earlier lockfile patch failure. I’m rerunning once against the now-consistent `.next` tree.

Worker process exited while command was still in_progress: /bin/bash -lc 'rm -rf .next && NEXT_IGNORE_INCORRECT_LOCKFILE=1 npm run build'. Recent context: tries; fixing that would be outside the requested two-file change, so I need to verify before deciding whether this is a blocker. · Next exposes `NEXT_IGNORE_INCORRECT_LOCKFILE`; I’m using it once to verify the new code against the production build path without letting Next’s lockfile patcher derail trace collection. The standard `npm run build` result remains a failure and I’ll report it exactly.

Worker process exited while command was still in_progress: /bin/bash -lc 'rm -rf .next && NEXT_IGNORE_INCORRECT_LOCKFILE=1 npm run build'. Recent context: ion because `.next/package.json` could not be opened even though `.next` exists. I’m retrying once after explicitly ensuring the build directory exists; if it repeats, I’ll treat build as blocked by local Next state. · The retry compiled and failed cleaning `.next/export`, which is a stale build artifact issue. I’m removing only `.next` and rerunning build with the same non-mutating lockfile flag.

(a) Attempted to recover parser context from previous session — recovered only empty payload and mention of 'guided-flow files' with no specifics. (b) Blocked by insufficient context in log: no details on what PEP-115 required, what files were involved, what the actual task was, or what state the branch was left in. Raw marker was missing entirely. (c) To proceed: would need either the original issue description (what PEP-115 was meant to accomplish), the specific files it touched, or the git diff of what was attempted.

BLOCKER_FORCED_BLANK: worker emitted unknown with no usable summary; reason=reprompt-still-bare

Should PEP-66 wait for B1.1/B4.2 state to land locally before editing source write paths?

May I add the PEP-91 pricing migration rows for transaction_recency at $15/lead and lifecycle stage keys despite the value-laden lock?

Should PEP-66 wait for missing B1.1/B4.2 write paths, or expand scope here?

Confirm PEP-91 pricing rows before implementing recency model rebuild?

Should PEP-66 add the missing lead_order_items.source schema and absent insert paths first?

Should PEP-66 add the missing lead_order_items.source schema and absent insert paths first?

B1.1 schema assumption is not reflected in repo; should I widen lead_orders.status before marking B5.1 done?

B1.1 schema assumption is not reflected in repo; should I widen lead_orders.status before marking B5.1 done?

PEP-66 names three lead_order_items insert sites, but this checkout only has one; should I wait for B4.2 or scope to current code?

BLOCKER_FORCED_BLANK: worker emitted unknown with no usable summary; reason=reprompt-spawn-failed

BLOCKER_FORCED_BLANK: worker emitted unknown with no usable summary; reason=reprompt-spawn-failed

BLOCKER_FORCED_BLANK: worker emitted unknown with no usable summary; reason=reprompt-spawn-failed

BLOCKER_FORCED_BLANK: worker emitted unknown with no usable summary; reason=reprompt-spawn-failed

BLOCKER_FORCED_BLANK: worker emitted unknown with no usable summary; reason=reprompt-spawn-failed

BLOCKER_FORCED_BLANK: worker emitted unknown with no usable summary; reason=reprompt-still-bare

Can you place the V10 Harness Guardian spec inside /home/aadil/conduit or authorize an in-workdir source path?

BLOCKER_FORCED_BLANK: worker emitted blocker with no usable summary; reason=reprompt-still-bare

Sandbox command execution fails before repo reads, so should this worker be retried in a functioning runtime?

BLOCKER_FORCED_BLANK: worker emitted unknown with no usable summary; reason=reprompt-still-bare

BLOCKER_FORCED_BLANK: worker emitted unknown with no usable summary; reason=reprompt-still-bare

BLOCKER_FORCED_BLANK: worker emitted unknown with no usable summary; reason=reprompt-still-bare

BLOCKER_FORCED_BLANK: worker emitted unknown with no usable summary; reason=reprompt-still-bare

BLOCKER_FORCED_BLANK: worker emitted unknown with no usable summary; reason=reprompt-still-bare

BLOCKER_FORCED_BLANK: worker emitted unknown with no usable summary; reason=reprompt-still-bare

BLOCKER_FORCED_BLANK: worker emitted unknown with no usable summary; reason=reprompt-still-bare

BLOCKER_FORCED_BLANK: worker emitted unknown with no usable summary; reason=reprompt-still-bare

BLOCKER_FORCED_BLANK: worker emitted unknown with no usable summary; reason=reprompt-still-bare

BLOCKER_FORCED_BLANK: worker emitted unknown with no usable summary; reason=reprompt-still-bare

(worker emitted bare marker; synthesised)

(worker emitted bare marker; synthesised)

(worker emitted bare marker; synthesised)

(unparseable payload — tap to view raw)

(unparseable payload — tap to view raw)

(unparseable payload — tap to view raw)

(unparseable payload — tap to view raw)

(unparseable payload — tap to view raw)

(unparseable payload — tap to view raw)

(unparseable payload — tap to view raw)

(worker emitted bare marker; synthesised)

(worker emitted bare marker; synthesised)

(worker emitted bare marker; synthesised)